|


Flying
Arts was the only consistent influence
When we came to
Monto and ‘Rawbelle', which is a big cattle property, I heard that Flying
Arts travelled to Monto and Theodore and that you could have painting
and drawing lessons. It wasn't until we moved closer to Theodore that
I was able to access them. I heard that Mervyn Moriarty was ‘god' to
everybody who went to Flying Arts. This would have been about 1974 and
my first tutor was Bela Ivanyi who almost cured me of doing anything
more about art. There was a little old lady who had been on a trip to
New Zealand and she very carefully pinned the postcards to her easel
and had done a perfect reproduction of the postcard. Bela didn't seem
to have a very high opinion of that at all. He said some rather cruel
and hard things to her and I thought, if this man is going to talk to
people like that I think I'd better get out of here. I didn't go back
the next day because we had three inches of rain, I honestly could have
if I'd wanted to, but I used the rain as my excuse. Brisbane watercolourist,
Wilson (George) Cooper, gave me some lessons. He would sit beside me
and every now and then touch my hand and say, "Stop tickling your painting
Ellie."
I
heard that Mervyn was flying in to Monto, and because it was Mervyn,
I thought I'd give it another go, so I loaded up the one ton truck with
great big paintings - about six. They barely fitted on the tray of the
truck and I took them over for Mervyn to have a look at. He was really
very kind and very helpful because they were not good paintings.
My work changed
fairly rapidly and there were other influences besides Flying Arts,
but Flying Arts was the only consistent one. I think what Mervyn managed
to get through to me was that it is not just a matter of getting the
paint down. That's fairly important because even if you do things that
are just random marks you still have to think about the random marks
before you make them.
I only ever had
Mervyn once as a tutor because I came in right at the end of his time.
At that time it was purely a hobby, I had no vision of doing anything
other than painting purely for a bit of pleasure. I have always worked
very loosely and thought it was awful because it was loose. When I ran
up against Irene Amos I realised that painting loosely might be a good
thing to do rather than a bad thing. I think, looking back, my work
was more representational than anything else. When I fell off a horse
and did considerable damage to my neck and shoulders, and the use of
my arms was limited for a time, I thought my great painting career would
be gone forever. I was introduced to etching by Peter Indans at the
Institute at Rockhampton and I just liked the way marks were made on
the plate.
Eventually I needed
an etching press. I tried driving the car over sheets of tin and lifting
the corner of the house with a wallaby jack and letting it down but
nothing worked – it didn't print. I got a press with compensation for
my injured neck and we had a party when it arrived. Roy Orloff attended
this party as he was one of the Flying Arts tutor. I often had the tutor
and the pilot to stay.
Beverley
Budgen, Jeanne Macaskill, Wendy Mills and Ruth Propsteen were also important
to the development of my work. When I was well enough again, I just
picked up every workshop I could go to. I went to Flying Arts and the
McGregor Summer School and to Irene Amos, and John Rigby when I was
coming out of using only black and white or sepia and cream. That was
all I could do in etching and I wanted to learn colour. There were just
a huge number of people that had input and they were all very generous
with their time and their friendship. I remember saying that it wasn't
a good idea to send the same tutor for two years because you started
to paint like they did and it was better to sample the work of a range
of tutors so that you didn't become the clone of anybody.
Bev brought laughter,
to be able to look at your work and to realise that it wasn't any big
deal and not to be to precious about it. She certainly taught me to
laugh at myself - nothing's precious. It helped at exhibitions when
people would comment that any kid could do the work. I think what John
and Irene did was to make you think about what you were doing. It wasn't
just a blank mind and a hand creating. It was: if I do this what will
it do to that, and if I do this how many more changes will I have to
make before it will work again?
I tend to work
in series and it has been about the land because that has been my experience.
I won the easel painting section of the Martin Hanson Memorial Art Competition
twice in the last ten years. Each section would have two or three hundred
entries.
When I first looked
at the bottle trees I was dammed if I was going to paint those things.
Everybody else did so I wasn't going to. Then I walked down the hill
here and felt the bark. They almost took on a human life of their own
and they simply demanded to be a decorative part of the landscape. I
don't know how, but they just made me do it. After drawing bottle trees
for about five years I thought I could draw bottle trees that weren't
really bottle trees and they developed quite sinuous lines of their
own. Sometimes they'll appear to be talking to each other in bottle
tree language and sometimes they will be turning their backs on brigalow
trees which also live around here. There are two different types of
bottle trees and I couldn't do one without the other. There will always
be both kinds in the painting, they seem to belong.
 
|